Replace usage of deprecated assertEquals with assertEqual (#19345)

This commit is contained in:
Andrew Morgan 2026-01-06 12:30:21 -05:00 committed by GitHub
parent cd252db3f5
commit 1500733f4a
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
6 changed files with 16 additions and 15 deletions

1
changelog.d/19345.misc Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1 @@
Replace usage of deprecated `assertEquals` with `assertEqual` in unit test code.

View file

@ -889,11 +889,11 @@ class MasAuthDelegation(HomeserverTestCase):
)
)
self.assertEquals(requester.user.to_string(), USER_ID)
self.assertEquals(requester.device_id, DEVICE)
self.assertEqual(requester.user.to_string(), USER_ID)
self.assertEqual(requester.device_id, DEVICE)
self.assertFalse(self.get_success(self._auth.is_server_admin(requester)))
self.assertEquals(
self.assertEqual(
self.server.last_token_seen,
"some_token",
)
@ -912,11 +912,11 @@ class MasAuthDelegation(HomeserverTestCase):
)
)
self.assertEquals(requester.user.to_string(), USER_ID)
self.assertEquals(requester.device_id, DEVICE)
self.assertEqual(requester.user.to_string(), USER_ID)
self.assertEqual(requester.device_id, DEVICE)
self.assertFalse(self.get_success(self._auth.is_server_admin(requester)))
self.assertEquals(
self.assertEqual(
self.server.last_token_seen,
"some_token",
)

View file

@ -3362,7 +3362,7 @@ class MakeRoomAdminTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
pl = self.helper.get_state(
room_id, EventTypes.PowerLevels, tok=self.creator_tok
)
self.assertEquals(pl["users"][self.admin_user], 100)
self.assertEqual(pl["users"][self.admin_user], 100)
def test_v12_room_with_many_user_pls(self) -> None:
"""Test that you can be promoted to the admin user's PL in v12 rooms that contain a range of user PLs."""
@ -3395,7 +3395,7 @@ class MakeRoomAdminTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
pl = self.helper.get_state(
room_id, EventTypes.PowerLevels, tok=self.creator_tok
)
self.assertEquals(pl["users"][self.admin_user], 100)
self.assertEqual(pl["users"][self.admin_user], 100)
class BlockRoomTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):

View file

@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ class StateResV21TestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
)
)
# no matter how many events are persisted, the overall diff should always be the same.
self.assertEquals(got_auth_diff, got_auth_diff2)
self.assertEqual(got_auth_diff, got_auth_diff2)
# now we will drip feed in `events` one-by-one, persisting them then resolving with the
# rest. This ensures we correctly handle mixed persisted/unpersisted events. We will finish

View file

@ -909,7 +909,7 @@ class EventFederationWorkerStoreTestCase(tests.unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
test_case.conflicted,
test_case.additional_backwards_reachable,
)
self.assertEquals(
self.assertEqual(
result.conflicted_subgraph,
test_case.want_conflicted_subgraph,
f"{test_case.name} : conflicted subgraph mismatch",

View file

@ -8,13 +8,13 @@ class RoomIDTestCase(TestCase):
def test_can_create_msc4291_room_ids(self) -> None:
valid_msc4291_room_id = "!31hneApxJ_1o-63DmFrpeqnkFfWppnzWso1JvH3ogLM"
room_id = RoomID.from_string(valid_msc4291_room_id)
self.assertEquals(RoomID.is_valid(valid_msc4291_room_id), True)
self.assertEquals(
self.assertEqual(RoomID.is_valid(valid_msc4291_room_id), True)
self.assertEqual(
room_id.to_string(),
valid_msc4291_room_id,
)
self.assertEquals(room_id.id, "!31hneApxJ_1o-63DmFrpeqnkFfWppnzWso1JvH3ogLM")
self.assertEquals(room_id.get_domain(), None)
self.assertEqual(room_id.id, "!31hneApxJ_1o-63DmFrpeqnkFfWppnzWso1JvH3ogLM")
self.assertEqual(room_id.get_domain(), None)
def test_cannot_create_invalid_msc4291_room_ids(self) -> None:
invalid_room_ids = [
@ -47,5 +47,5 @@ class RoomIDTestCase(TestCase):
]
for room_id_str in valid_room_ids:
room_id = RoomID.from_string(room_id_str)
self.assertEquals(RoomID.is_valid(room_id_str), True)
self.assertEqual(RoomID.is_valid(room_id_str), True)
self.assertIsNotNone(room_id.get_domain())